Step 1: Data Preparation & Cleaning
Ensure your QC and refund logs are in a standardized format. Create separate tables or columns for:
- Date/Time Stamp:
- Order/Service ID:
- QC Result:
- Refund Issued:
Tip: Use the IF
Transform raw log data into actionable insights through clear graphs to optimize your service performance evaluation.
Tracking Quality Control (QC) fails and refund rates is crucial for any service-oriented platform. While the USFANS spreadsheet records this data, raw numbers in logs can be opaque. Visualization
QC StatusRefund Status.Ensure your QC and refund logs are in a standardized format. Create separate tables or columns for:
Tip: Use the IF
Create a summary section or a new sheet to calculate core metrics. Key formulas include:
QC Fail Rate = (COUNTIF(QC_Column, "Fail") / COUNTA(QC_Column)) * 100
Refund Rate = (COUNTIF(Refund_Column, "Yes") / COUNTA(Refund_Column)) * 100
Calculate these ratios for different time periods (daily, weekly, monthly) to enable trend analysis.
Select your data range and insert a Pivot Table. This is powerful for segmenting data.
Pivot Tables allow quick filtering by agent, service type, or time frame.
Select the summarized data from your Pivot Table or calculations and insert a chart.
Line Chart:QC Fail Rate %Refund Rate %
Pie or Donut Chart:Passed vs. Failed QC orders
Bar or Column Chart:acdifferent service providers or product categories.
Customize charts with clear titles, axis labels, and a legend.
Set up dynamic ranges or convert your data into a formal Table. When you add new log entries, your Pivot Tables and charts will update automatically with a simple refresh. This creates a live dashboard for continuous performance monitoring.
Visualization is only the first step. Here’s how to evaluate performance:
| Graph Pattern | Possible Insight | Actionable Step |
|---|---|---|
| Parallel rise in both QC fail and refund rates | QC issues are directly leading to customer dissatisfaction and refunds. | Review and enhance QC guidelines or agent training for specific failure points. |
| Low QC fail rate but high refund rate | Issues may be occurring post-QC, or refund reasons are unrelated to quality (e.g., shipping). | Analyze refund reason logs and refine post-delivery service protocols. |
| Spikes for a specific service category | A particular service or product line is underperforming. | Conduct a targeted audit of that category's workflow and supplier quality. |
| Consistent downward trend in both rates | Service improvements are effective. | Identify and reinforce the successful practices causing the improvement. |